Thanks Alice. Jasdip
> On Oct 10, 2025, at 12:44 PM, Alice Russo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Authors, > > We have noted your approvals on the AUTH48 page for this document > (https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9877). We will move this document > forward in the publication process. > > Thank you for your time. > > Alice Russo > RFC Production Center > >> On Oct 9, 2025, at 2:35 PM, Jasdip Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> Thanks, >> Jasdip >> >>>> On Oct 9, 2025, at 4:35 PM, Tom Harrison <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Alice, >>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 09, 2025 at 11:06:54AM -0700, Alice Russo wrote: >>>> Thank you for your replies; please see one follow-up below. The revised >>>> files are here (please refresh): >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9877.html >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9877.txt >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9877.pdf >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9877.xml >>>> >>>> This diff file shows all changes from the approved I-D: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9877-diff.html >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9877-rfcdiff.html (side by side) >>>> >>>> This diff file shows the changes made during AUTH48 thus far: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9877-auth48diff.html >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9877-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by >>>> side) >>>> >>>> Re: Section 1, in addition to removing 'they' as Tom requested, we've >>>> removed the comma and updated to 'features' plural. Previously, the comma >>>> indicated two independent clauses. >>>> >>>> Original: >>>> Indentation and whitespace in examples are provided only to >>>> illustrate element relationships, and are not a required feature of >>>> this specification. >>>> >>>> Current text: >>>> Indentation and whitespace in examples are provided only to >>>> illustrate element relationships and are not required features >>>> of this specification. >>>> >>>> Alternatively, please let us know if you prefer: >>>> In examples, indentation and whitespace are provided only to >>>> illustrate element relationships: neither is a required feature >>>> of this specification. >>>> >>>> We will wait to hear from you again and from your coauthors >>>> before continuing the publication process. This page shows >>>> the AUTH48 status of your document: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9877 >>> >>> Thanks for these updates. The suggested text (i.e. "Indentation and >>> whitespace in examples are provided only to illustrate element >>> relationships and are not required features of this specification") >>> looks fine to me. I approve for publication. >>> >>> -Tom > -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
