Hi Jake, Thank you for your review. We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 page <https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9881>. We will continue with publication once we hear from Sean as well.
Thank you, Sandy Ginoza RFC Production Center > On Oct 13, 2025, at 5:51 PM, Massimo, Jake <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Sandy, > > Approved! > > Cheers, > Jake > > On 10/12/25, 12:03 PM, "Sandy Ginoza" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click > links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the > content is safe. > > > > > > > Hi Bas and Panos, > > > Thank you for your reviews. We have noted your approvals on the AUTH48 page > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9881>. Once > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9881>. Once> we have > received approvals from you coauthors, we will continue with the publication > process. > > > Thank you, > Sandy Ginoza > RFC Production Center > > > > > > >> On Oct 11, 2025, at 8:39 PM, Kampanakis, Panos <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Approved >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Sandy Ginoza <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 4:16 PM >> To: Bas Westerbaan <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> Cc: Sean Turner <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; Massimo, Jake >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; >> Kampanakis, Panos <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; RFC Editor >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>; Russ Housley <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>>; Deb Cooley <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9881 >> <draft-ietf-lamps-dilithium-certificates-13> for your review >> >> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not >> click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know >> the content is safe. >> >> >> >> Hi Jake, Bas, and Sean, >> >> We have updated the document and posted the revised files here: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881.xml >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881.xml> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881.txt >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881.txt> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881.pdf >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881.pdf> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881.html >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881.html> >> >> Diffs highlighting only the recent changes: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-lastdiff.html >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-lastdiff.html> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-lastrfcdiff.html >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-lastrfcdiff.html> (side by side) >> >> AUTH48 diffs: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-auth48diff.html >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-auth48diff.html> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-auth48rfcdiff.html >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-auth48rfcdiff.html> (side by >> side) >> >> Comprehensive diffs: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-diff.html >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-diff.html> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-rfcdiff.html >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-rfcdiff.html> (side by side) >> >> >> Bas - regarding the following, the lines in RFC 5912 are already outdented >> (see https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5912.txt >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5912.txt>, p17). The lines in RFC 5912 >> are actually outdented 3 additional spaces; we are unable to make them match >> with our current tools. >> >>>> Note that instead of breaking the line, we outdented — please let us know >>>> if you prefer otherwise. >>> >>> Outdenting looks good to me, I'm assuming both "Current" and "From >>> [RFC5912]" will be outdented to match eachother. >> >> >> Please review and let us know if any further updates are needed or if you >> approve the RFC for publication. >> >> Thanks, >> Sandy Ginoza >> RFC Production Center >> >> >> >>> On Oct 10, 2025, at 6:01 AM, Bas Westerbaan <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Yes, good catch. >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 2:57 PM Sean Turner <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> Just want to make sure I didn’t introduce an error, but wanted more eyes: >>> >>> Appendix D includes this: >>> >>> # Referred to as 'Externalμ-ML-DSA.Prehash(pk, M, ctx)' >>> # in the FIPS 204 FAQ. >>> >>> and this: >>> >>> # Referred to as 'Externalμ-ML-DSA.Sign(sk, μ)' >>> # in the FIPS 204 FAQ. >>> >>> Do we need to change these μ to Mu because that’s how the are actually >>> referenced in the FIPS FAQ? >>> >>> spt >>> >>> >>>> On Oct 10, 2025, at 06:03, Bas Westerbaan <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Sandy, >>>> >>>> Thank you for the quick updates. >>>> >>>> I see some changes are still required. >>>> >>>> - Section 2. Regarding changes for your origin point 1: you added an >>>> ampersand in front of "Params", but not in front of "id" on the line >>>> before that. >>>> >>>> - References. Regarding changes for your original point 7: you haven't >>>> updated the URL of the reference CDFFJ21 to the specific version >>>> correctly. It should be >>>> https://eprint.iacr.org/archive/2020/1525/20231023:114351 >>>> <https://eprint.iacr.org/archive/2020/1525/20231023:114351> >>>> >>>> Otherwise it looks great, thanks! >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Bas >>>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 4:50 AM Massimo, Jake >>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>>> wrote: >>>> Hey Sandy, Bas, >>>> >>>> I can check a few confirmations off of this list: >>>> >>>>> Note that instead of breaking the line, we outdented — please let us know >>>>> if you prefer otherwise. >>>> >>>> Outdenting looks good to me, I'm assuming both "Current" and "From >>>> [RFC5912]" will be outdented to match eachother. >>>> >>>>> We updated to use “pre-hash” except in the following: >>>>> # Referred to as 'Externalμ-ML-DSA.Prehash(pk, M, ctx)' >>>>> Please let us know if any updates are needed. >>>> >>>> Confirming this is ok, and that we would not want to change >>>> 'Externalμ-ML-DSA.Prehash'. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Jake >>>> >>> >> > > > > > -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
