Hi Francesca (also adding current ART ADs to this thread), This is a friendly reminder that we have received a new version of this document that is currently in AUTH48. Please see https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-25 to review and approve these changes, as well as Carsten’s email below for more information.
Thank you! Madison Church RFC Production Center > On Oct 14, 2025, at 10:51 AM, Lynne Bartholomew > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, Francesca. > > We received a New Version notification for this document. This document is > currently in the AUTH48 state. > > Please review > <https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-25> and > Carsten's email below (which provides background), and let us know if you > approve of these updates. > > Thank you! > > Lynne Bartholomew > RFC Production Center > >> On Oct 13, 2025, at 2:00 AM, [email protected] wrote: >> >> >> A new version (-25) has been submitted for draft-ietf-asdf-sdf: >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-25.txt >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-25.html >> >> >> The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-asdf-sdf/ >> >> Diff from previous version: >> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-25 >> >> IETF Secretariat. >> >> From: Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9880 <draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-24> for >> your review >> Date: October 13, 2025 at 2:13:38 AM PDT >> To: RFC Errata System <[email protected]> >> Cc: Michael Koster <[email protected]>, Ari Keränen >> <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], Michael >> Richardson <[email protected]>, Francesca Palombini >> <[email protected]>, [email protected] >> >> RFC-editor, >> ART ADs, >> >> On 2025-10-10, at 22:02, Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Please note that we are also preparing a -25, with two typo/C&P fixes and >>> one more technical omission fixed (PR #187 to #189 in >>> https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/SDF/pulls). >>> We previously prepared a -24 with PR #186 in it (technical omissions), >>> which you already picked up. >>> You probably need AD approval for all these. >> >> We now submitted the -25, which is actually now composed of the changes in >> PR #187, #188, and #190 in >> https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/SDF/pulls?q=is%3Apr (q.v.). >> >> Note that the CDDL change in PR#190 triggers regeneration of the JSO. >> Since the last regeneration, an underlying library of the conversion tool >> has made some JSON prettyprinting style adjustments. >> These actually contain some improvements (wasting less space), so even >> though there is no semantic change in the JSO, we would like to use the >> newly regenerated version. >> (We did test the regenerated JSO.) >> >> As a result of checking in the regenerated JSO with these stylistic >> improvements, there is a large amount of change noise caused in the >> sourcecode element in Appendix B. >> This is best solved by doing a wholesale replacement of the generated >> text for the sourcecode element in Appendix B. >> >> Apologies for causing that work. >> >> Grüße, Carsten >> > -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
