Dear Zahed (AD), Please review the removal of the following text from Section 4.1.5 and let us know if you approve. The update can be viewed in this file: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9876-auth48diff.html>.
Section 4.1.5 (removed text): For each of the following example registration requests, one can create a similar instance where the requested registration is for a CoAP Content-Format identifier within the "IETF Review with Expert Review or IESG Approval with Expert Review" range. Likewise, such registrations must not be allowed to succeed. —Files— (please refresh) Updated XML file: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9876.xml Updated output files: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9876.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9876.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9876.html Diff files showing all changes made during AUTH48: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9876-auth48diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9876-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) Diff files showing all changes: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9876-diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9876-rfcdiff.html (side by side) For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9876 Best regards, Karen Moore RFC Production Center >> On Oct 10, 2025, at 11:18 AM, Karen Moore <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Dear Esko, Thomas, and *Mike (AD), >> >> The IANA actions are complete. >> >> *Mike, please review the removal of the following text from Section 4.1.5 >> and let us know if you approve. The update can be viewed in this file: >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9876-auth48diff.html>. >> >> Section 4.1.5 (removed text): >> For each of the following example registration requests, one can >> create a similar instance where the requested registration is for a >> CoAP Content-Format identifier within the "IETF Review with Expert >> Review or IESG Approval with Expert Review" range. Likewise, such >> registrations must not be allowed to succeed. >> >> >> —Files (please refresh)— >> >> Updated XML file: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9876.xml >> >> Updated output files: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9876.txt >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9876.pdf >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9876.html >> >> Diff files showing all changes made during AUTH48: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9876-auth48diff.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9876-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) >> >> Diff files showing all changes: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9876-diff.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9876-rfcdiff.html (side by side) >> >> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9876 >> >> Best regards, >> >> Karen Moore >> RFC Production Center >> >> >>> On Oct 9, 2025, at 10:49 AM, Karen Moore <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Oct 9, 2025, at 10:47 AM, Karen Moore <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Dear Thomas and Esko, >>> >>> Thank you for your replies. We have noted your approvals on the AUTH48 >>> status page (https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9876). >>> >>> We will now ask IANA to make updates accordingly, and we will inform you >>> when complete. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Karen Moore >>> RFC Production Center >>>> >>>>> On Oct 9, 2025, at 1:56 AM, Esko Dijk <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Thanks Karen & RFC editors staff, >>>>> >>>>> Also approved now for me! >>>>> >>>>> best regards >>>>> Esko Dijk >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Oct 8, 2025, at 6:21 PM, Thomas Fossati <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Karen, >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2025 at 21:43, Karen Moore <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Thank you for your comments! We have updated the document accordingly; >>>>>> please see the updated files below. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please let us know if you approve the document in its current form or if >>>>>> any additional edits are needed. Once approvals are received, we will >>>>>> ask IANA to update their registry to match the edited document. >>>>> >>>>> The updates accurately reflect all our previous exchanges. >>>>> On my part, I am happy to approve publication. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you very much for your excellent work on the document. >>>>> Alos, many thanks for choosing such an exciting number for what would >>>>> otherwise be a rather dull RFC :-) >>>>> >>>>> cheers, t >>>> >>> >> > -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
