Hi, Apologies for the delay.
Inline: On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 3:54 PM Sarah Tarrant <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Authors, > > This is a friendly reminder that we await answers to the answers below. > > Thank you, > Sarah Tarrant > RFC Production Center > > > On Oct 20, 2025, at 1:48 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > > > Author(s), > > > > Congratulations! Your document has been successfully added to the RFC > Editor queue. > > The team at the RFC Production Center (RPC) is looking forward to > working with you > > as your document moves forward toward publication. To help reduce > processing time > > and improve editing accuracy, please respond to the questions below. > Please confer > > with your coauthors (or authors of other documents if your document is > in a > > cluster) as necessary prior to taking action in order to streamline > communication. > > If your document has multiple authors, only one author needs to reply to > this > > message. > > > > As you read through the rest of this email: > > > > * If you need/want to make updates to your document, we encourage you to > make those > > changes and resubmit to the Datatracker. This allows for the easy > creation of diffs, > > which facilitates review by interested parties (e.g., authors, ADs, doc > shepherds). > > > > * If you feel no updates to the document are necessary, please reply > with any > > applicable rationale/comments. > > > > > > Please note that the RPC team will not work on your document until we > hear from you > > (that is, your document will remain in AUTH state until we receive a > reply). Even > > if you don't have guidance or don't feel that you need to make any > updates to the > > document, you need to let us know. After we hear from you, your document > will start > > moving through the queue. You will be able to review and approve our > updates > > during AUTH48. > > > > Please feel free to contact us with any questions you may have at > > [email protected]. > > > > Thank you! > > > > The RPC Team > > > > -- > > > > 1) As there may have been multiple updates made to the document during > Last Call, > > please review the current version of the document: > > > > * Is the text in the Abstract still accurate? > Yes > > > > * Are the Authors' Addresses, Contributors, and Acknowledgments > > sections current? > Yes. > > > > > > 2) Please share any style information that could help us with editing > your > > document. For example: > > > > * Is your document's format or its terminology based on another > document? > > If so, please provide a pointer to that document (e.g., this document's > > terminology should match DNS terminology in RFC 9499). > We have CBOR Extended Diagnostic Notation examples and JSON examples, here are the relevant RFCs & drafts: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7517 https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8610#appendix-G https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals/ > > > > * Is there a pattern of capitalization or formatting of terms? (e.g., > field names > > should have initial capitalization; parameter names should be in double > quotes; > > <tt/> should be used for token names; etc.) > JOSE parameter names are quoted, as they appear in JSON, for example "kty". COSE related parameters are identified with their integer values. > > > > > > 3) Please review the entries in the References section carefully with > > the following in mind. Note that we will update as follows unless we > > hear otherwise at this time: > > > > -References to obsoleted RFCs will be updated to point to the current > > RFC on the topic in accordance with Section 4.8.6 of RFC 7322 > > (RFC Style Guide). > > > > -References to I-Ds that have been replaced by another I-D will be > > updated to point to the replacement I-D. > > > > -References to documents from other organizations that have been > > superseded will be updated to their superseding version. > > > > Note: To check for outdated RFC and I-D references, you can use > > idnits <https://author-tools.ietf.org/idnits>. You can also help the > > IETF Tools Team by testing idnits3 < > https://author-tools.ietf.org/idnits3/> > > with your document and reporting any issues to them. > > I have reviewed these sections, and did not notice anything. > > > > > 4) Is there any text that should be handled extra cautiously? For > example, are > > there any sections that were contentious when the document was drafted? No. > > > > > > > 5) Is there anything else that the RPC should be aware of while editing > this > > document? Not that I am aware of. > > > > > -- > > > > On Oct 20, 2025, at 11:01 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > > > Author(s), > > > > Your document draft-ietf-cose-dilithium-10, which has been approved for > publication as > > an RFC, has been added to the RFC Editor queue > > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/current_queue.php>. > > > > If your XML file was submitted using the I-D submission tool > > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/>, we have already retrieved it > > and have started working on it. > > > > If you did not submit the file via the I-D submission tool, or > > if you have an updated version (e.g., updated contact information), > > please send us the file at this time by attaching it > > in your reply to this message and specifying any differences > > between the approved I-D and the file that you are providing. > > > > You will receive a separate message from us asking for style input. > > Please respond to that message. When we have received your response, > > your document will then move through the queue. The first step that > > we take as your document moves through the queue is converting it to > > RFCXML (if it is not already in RFCXML) and applying the formatting > > steps listed at <https://www.rfc-editor.org/pubprocess/how-we-update/>. > > Next, we will edit for clarity and apply the style guide > > (<https://www.rfc-editor.org/styleguide/>). > > > > You can check the status of your document at > > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/current_queue.php>. > > > > You will receive automatic notifications as your document changes > > queue state (for more information about these states, please see > > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/about/queue/>). When we have completed > > our edits, we will move your document to AUTH48 state and ask you > > to perform a final review of the document. > > > > Please let us know if you have any questions. > > > > Thank you. > > > > The RFC Editor Team > > > >
-- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
