Hi! A gentle ping to see about getting this done before the end of the week 
when everybody is going to disappear (if they haven’t already :)

spt

> On Dec 12, 2025, at 17:32, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> Authors,
> 
> While reviewing this document during AUTH48, please resolve (as necessary) 
> the following questions, which are also in the source file.
> 
> 
> 1) <!-- [rfced] Please insert any keywords (beyond those that appear in
> the title) for use on https://www.rfc-editor.org/search. -->
> 
> 
> 2) <!--[rfced] FYI - We moved the second sentence in the title of Figure 2 
> out of
> the title. It now directly follows the figure. Please review and let us
> know of any objections.
> 
> Original:
>   Figure 2: Simple example zone with the same configuration on the
>   apex and web domain.  It is compatible with clients that do or do
>                     not support HTTPS records.
> 
> Current:
>   Figure 2: Simple Example Zone with the Same Configuration on the
>                   Apex and Web Domain
> 
> 
>   The example above is compatible with clients that do or do not support
>   HTTPS records.
> -->
> 
> 
> 3) <!-- [rfced] Figures 1 and 3 are too long for the line limit of the text
> output (72 characters in the text, which means 69 characters within the
> sourcecode element in the XML file). Please let us know how these figures
> should be updated.
> 
> a) Figure 1 - perhaps break at the "/"
> 
> Original:
>   ech="AEj+DQBEAQAgACAdd+scUi0IYFsXnUIU7ko2Nd9+F8M26pAGZVpz/KrWPgAEAAEAAWQ
>   VZWNoLXNpdGVzLmV4YW1wbGUubmV0AAA="
> 
> Perhaps:
>   ech="AEj+DQBEAQAgACAdd+scUi0IYFsXnUIU7ko2Nd9+F8M26pAGZVpz/
>   KrWPgAEAAEAAWQVZWNoLXNpdGVzLmV4YW1wbGUubmV0AAA="
> 
> b) Figure 3 - perhaps change "two" to "2"
> 
> Original:
>  $ORIGIN heterogeneous.example. ; Example zone with two pools of servers
> 
> Perhaps:
>  $ORIGIN heterogeneous.example. ; Example zone with 2 pools of servers
> -->
> 
> 
> 4) <!-- [rfced] We updated <artwork> to <sourcecode> in the figures in this
> document. Currently, the "type" attribute is not set. Please review the
> types at https://www.rfc-editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=sourcecode-types,
> and let us know if one is applicable. If the list does not contain an 
> applicable
> type, then feel free to let us know. Also, it is acceptable to leave the
> "type" attribute not set.
> 
> Note: RFC 9460 used type="dns-rr" for sourcecode similar to Figures 2-7 in
> this document.
> -->
> 
> 
> 5) <!-- [rfced] FYI - We have added expansions for the following abbreviations
> per Section 3.6 of RFC 7322 ("RFC Style Guide"). Please review each
> expansion in the document carefully to ensure correctness.
> 
> Application-Layer Protocol Negotiation (ALPN)
> resource record set (RRSet)
> -->
> 
> 
> 6) <!-- [rfced] Please review the "Inclusive Language" portion of the online 
> Style Guide <https://www.rfc-editor.org/styleguide/part2/#inclusive_language> 
> and let us know if any changes are needed. 
> 
> Note that our script did not flag any words in particular, but this should 
> still 
> be reviewed as a best practice.
> -->
> 
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Alanna Paloma and Rebecca VanRheenen
> RFC Production Center
> 
> 
> On Dec 12, 2025, at 2:29 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> *****IMPORTANT*****
> 
> Updated 2025/12/12
> 
> RFC Author(s):
> --------------
> 
> Instructions for Completing AUTH48
> 
> Your document has now entered AUTH48.  Once it has been reviewed and 
> approved by you and all coauthors, it will be published as an RFC.  
> If an author is no longer available, there are several remedies 
> available as listed in the FAQ (https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/).
> 
> You and you coauthors are responsible for engaging other parties 
> (e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before providing 
> your approval.
> 
> Planning your review 
> ---------------------
> 
> Please review the following aspects of your document:
> 
> *  RFC Editor questions
> 
>  Please review and resolve any questions raised by the RFC Editor 
>  that have been included in the XML file as comments marked as 
>  follows:
> 
>  <!-- [rfced] ... -->
> 
>  These questions will also be sent in a subsequent email.
> 
> *  Changes submitted by coauthors 
> 
>  Please ensure that you review any changes submitted by your 
>  coauthors.  We assume that if you do not speak up that you 
>  agree to changes submitted by your coauthors.
> 
> *  Content 
> 
>  Please review the full content of the document, as this cannot 
>  change once the RFC is published.  Please pay particular attention to:
>  - IANA considerations updates (if applicable)
>  - contact information
>  - references
> 
> *  Copyright notices and legends
> 
>  Please review the copyright notice and legends as defined in
>  RFC 5378 and the Trust Legal Provisions 
>  (TLP – https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
> 
> *  Semantic markup
> 
>  Please review the markup in the XML file to ensure that elements of  
>  content are correctly tagged.  For example, ensure that <sourcecode> 
>  and <artwork> are set correctly.  See details at 
>  <https://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary>.
> 
> *  Formatted output
> 
>  Please review the PDF, HTML, and TXT files to ensure that the 
>  formatted output, as generated from the markup in the XML file, is 
>  reasonable.  Please note that the TXT will have formatting 
>  limitations compared to the PDF and HTML.
> 
> 
> Submitting changes
> ------------------
> 
> To submit changes, please reply to this email using ‘REPLY ALL’ as all 
> the parties CCed on this message need to see your changes. The parties 
> include:
> 
>  *  your coauthors
> 
>  *  [email protected] (the RPC team)
> 
>  *  other document participants, depending on the stream (e.g., 
>     IETF Stream participants are your working group chairs, the 
>     responsible ADs, and the document shepherd).
> 
>  *  [email protected], which is a new archival mailing list 
>     to preserve AUTH48 conversations; it is not an active discussion 
>     list:
> 
>    *  More info:
>       
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/yb6lpIGh-4Q9l2USxIAe6P8O4Zc
> 
>    *  The archive itself:
>       https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/
> 
>    *  Note: If only absolutely necessary, you may temporarily opt out 
>       of the archiving of messages (e.g., to discuss a sensitive matter).
>       If needed, please add a note at the top of the message that you 
>       have dropped the address. When the discussion is concluded, 
>       [email protected] will be re-added to the CC list and 
>       its addition will be noted at the top of the message. 
> 
> You may submit your changes in one of two ways:
> 
> An update to the provided XML file
> — OR —
> An explicit list of changes in this format
> 
> Section # (or indicate Global)
> 
> OLD:
> old text
> 
> NEW:
> new text
> 
> You do not need to reply with both an updated XML file and an explicit 
> list of changes, as either form is sufficient.
> 
> We will ask a stream manager to review and approve any changes that seem
> beyond editorial in nature, e.g., addition of new text, deletion of text, 
> and technical changes.  Information about stream managers can be found in 
> the FAQ.  Editorial changes do not require approval from a stream manager.
> 
> 
> Approving for publication
> --------------------------
> 
> To approve your RFC for publication, please reply to this email stating
> that you approve this RFC for publication.  Please use ‘REPLY ALL’,
> as all the parties CCed on this message need to see your approval.
> 
> 
> Files 
> -----
> 
> The files are available here:
>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9848.xml
>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9848.html
>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9848.pdf
>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9848.txt
> 
> Diff file of the text:
>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9848-diff.html
>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9848-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
> 
> Diff of the XML: 
>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9848-xmldiff1.html
> 
> 
> Tracking progress
> -----------------
> 
> The details of the AUTH48 status of your document are here:
>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9848
> 
> Please let us know if you have any questions.  
> 
> Thank you for your cooperation,
> 
> RFC Editor
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC9848 (draft-ietf-tls-svcb-ech-08)
> 
> Title            : Bootstrapping TLS Encrypted ClientHello with DNS Service 
> Bindings
> Author(s)        : B. Schwartz, M. Bishop, E. Nygren
> WG Chair(s)      : Joseph A. Salowey, Sean Turner, Deirdre Connolly
> 
> Area Director(s) : Deb Cooley, Paul Wouters

-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to