Rich and Nimrod, Note that this document normatively references RFCs-to-be 9846 and 9851, both of which are currently in AUTH48. This document will be published at the same time as those documents.
Apologies for not mentioning this in my previous email. Best regards, Rebecca VanRheenen RFC Production Center > On Jan 7, 2026, at 1:21 PM, Rebecca VanRheenen > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Paul, Rich, and Nimrod, > > Paul - Thanks for the reply. We noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page > for this document: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9852. > > Rich and Nimrod - We have all needed approvals, so we will begin to prepare > this document for publication at this time. Thank you for your prompt and > clear responses during AUTH48! This was a very fast and smooth AUTH48. > > Best regards, > > Rebecca VanRheenen > RFC Production Center > > > >> On Jan 7, 2026, at 12:46 PM, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 7, 2026 at 3:15 PM Rebecca VanRheenen >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Rich, Nimrod, and *Paul, >> >> Rich, we did not make any changes to your entry in the Authors’ Addresses >> section. Thanks for letting us know your preference about the street address. >> >> Nimrod, we marked your approval on the AUTH48 status page for this document: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9852. >> >> *Paul, as AD, please review the following question and let us know your >> thoughts. Note that Rich and Nimrod are fine with the current assignment of >> BCP 195 if you concur. Both authors have approved the document, so once you >> have addressed this question, we will begin to prepare the document for >> publication. >> >>> 1) <!-- [rfced] Authors and *AD - We have marked this document as part of >>> BCP 195 because it updates RFC 9325, which is part of BCP 195. However, >>> please review and let us know if this document should be assigned a new >>> BCP number instead. >> >> That makes sense. Approved. >> >> Paul >> >>> If needed, the complete list of BCPs is available here: >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/bcps >>> --> >> >> Best regards, >> >> Rebecca VanRheenen >> RFC Production Center >> >> >> >> >>> On Jan 7, 2026, at 11:41 AM, Nimrod Aviram <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Rebecca, >>> >>> Looks good to me too. >>> I also approve, thanks a lot for your help! >>> >>> best wishes, >>> Nimrod >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 7 Jan 2026 at 20:29, Rebecca VanRheenen >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Rich and Nimrod, >>> >>> Thank you for your replies! We made the change to the Introduction. All of >>> our questions have now been addressed except for question #1. We are still >>> waiting for Paul (AD) to comment on that one. >>> >>> Please review the document carefully to ensure satisfaction as we do not >>> make changes once it has been published as an RFC. Contact us with any >>> further updates or with your approval of the document in its current form. >>> We will await approvals from each author prior to moving forward in the >>> publication process. >>> >>> The files are listed below (please refresh). >>> >>> Updated XML file: >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852.xml >>> >>> Updated output files: >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852.txt >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852.pdf >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852.html >>> >>> Diff files showing all changes made during AUTH48: >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852-auth48diff.html >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by >>> side) >>> >>> Diff files showing all changes: >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852-diff.html >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9852-rfcdiff.html (side by side) >>> >>> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9852 >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Rebecca VanRheenen >>> RFC Production Center >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Jan 7, 2026, at 5:44 AM, Salz, Rich <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> • Perhaps (remove sentence in first paragraph and update the sentence >>>> in the third paragraph as follows): >>>> • This document updates [RFC9325]. It discusses post-quantum >>>> • cryptography and the security and privacy improvements in TLS 1.3 as >>>> • the rationale for the update. See Section 5. >>>> >>>> Yes, please make that change. >>> >> > -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
