Hi Paul and Alexis, We’ve merged both pull requests for RFC-to-be 9920. Are any further updates needed? We need an acknowledgement from at least one author before converting the markdown file to XML.
Once we convert to XML, we’ll post diffs for you to review and request your final approvals. Please remember that all updates will occur in XML once the XML file is created. AUTH48 repo: https://github.com/rfc-editor/AUTH48-rfc9920 AUTH48 status page: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9920 Best regards, Rebecca VanRheenen RFC Production Center > On Jan 24, 2026, at 9:51 AM, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 23, 2026, at 18:32, Rebecca VanRheenen > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Apologies for the delay. We have been learning a lot from this experiment >> and having some discussions about process behind the scenes. Thanks for your >> patience! > > No problem, I was just wondering if the lack of response was "this is > complicated" vs. "we didn't see what you posted". > >> We reviewed your changes in: >> https://github.com/rfc-editor/AUTH48-rfc9920/pull/26 >> >> We closed all issues except for two. We left comments on those two open >> issues for your review. We also left comments on both PRs. >> >> We’ll look for your responses to those comments. > > I have commented in those open issues and PRs. For the one thing we forgot to > do, I pushed a new commit. We think this means we're all finished on our end, > but let us know if there are further unresolved points. > > --Paul Hoffman > -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
