All, We have now received all necessary approvals and consider AUTH48 complete: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9931
Thank you for your attention and guidance during the AUTH48 process. We will move this document forward in the publication process at this time. Sincerely, Sarah Tarrant RFC Production Center > On Mar 3, 2026, at 4:29 PM, Ben Schwartz <[email protected]> wrote: > > OK, thanks. I approve this version for publication. > > --BenFrom: Sarah Tarrant <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2026 5:28 PM > To: Ben Schwartz <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] > <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; > [email protected] <[email protected]>; > [email protected]<[email protected]>; [email protected] > <[email protected]>; > [email protected]<[email protected]> > Subject: Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9931 > <draft-ietf-httpbis-optimistic-upgrade-06> for your review > > > Hi Ben, > > Also done! Thank you for your careful review. > > The updated files have been posted here (please refresh): > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9931.txt__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!7j0wVtmFC3UrERfvGpICS1mhkUPftByVlWXYNdRhYSV7mfnIcK6rD-wSXRXygVqXlLKlEa2_rqVYYYt7oppFXg$ > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9931.pdf__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!7j0wVtmFC3UrERfvGpICS1mhkUPftByVlWXYNdRhYSV7mfnIcK6rD-wSXRXygVqXlLKlEa2_rqVYYYtAC1nnfQ$ > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9931.html__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!7j0wVtmFC3UrERfvGpICS1mhkUPftByVlWXYNdRhYSV7mfnIcK6rD-wSXRXygVqXlLKlEa2_rqVYYYt7ObhEHA$ > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9931.xml__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!7j0wVtmFC3UrERfvGpICS1mhkUPftByVlWXYNdRhYSV7mfnIcK6rD-wSXRXygVqXlLKlEa2_rqVYYYtefmD2wg$ > > The relevant diff files have been posted here (please refresh): > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9931-diff.html__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!7j0wVtmFC3UrERfvGpICS1mhkUPftByVlWXYNdRhYSV7mfnIcK6rD-wSXRXygVqXlLKlEa2_rqVYYYtqza3Wuw$ > (comprehensive diff) > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9931-auth48diff.html__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!7j0wVtmFC3UrERfvGpICS1mhkUPftByVlWXYNdRhYSV7mfnIcK6rD-wSXRXygVqXlLKlEa2_rqVYYYt8eD0zfw$ > (AUTH48 changes only) > > Note that it may be necessary for you to refresh your browser to view the > most recent version. > > For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9931__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!7j0wVtmFC3UrERfvGpICS1mhkUPftByVlWXYNdRhYSV7mfnIcK6rD-wSXRXygVqXlLKlEa2_rqVYYYvyrdNPjw$ > > Thank you, > Sarah Tarrant > RFC Production Center > > > > On Mar 3, 2026, at 3:06 PM, Ben Schwartz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Checking the diffs... > > > > In Section 3, the cite= attributes have been removed from two blockquotes > > referencing Section 7.8 and 9.3.6 of RFC 9110, replaced with section > > references in the text. For consistency, the later blockquote should also > > have the cite= attribute removed and converted to a section reference. > > > > --Ben > > -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
