I concur. Leave it as it is.
Todd On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 12:52 John R Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 18 May 2026, Alanna Paloma wrote: > > > Hi Todd and John, > > > > Thank you for your replies. We’ve fixed the nits pointed out by John and > noted his approval on the AUTH48 status page: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9989 > > > > We have one additional question regarding "RFC5322.From”. > > The description of the From header in 5322bis is unchanged from 5322 (I > just checked) and I expect that people reading this document will be > familar with RFC5322.From. So I'd prefer to leave it as is and not wait. > > Todd? > > R's, > John > > > > > The current value for dmarc in the "Email Authentication Methods" > registry < > https://www.iana.org/assignments/email-auth/email-auth.xhtml#email-auth-methods> > cites 5322bis, while this document uses "RFC5322.From” throughout. > > > > IANA registry: > > The domain portion of the [RFC-ietf-emailcore-rfc5322bis-12].From > header field > > > > Currently in document: > > The domain portion of the RFC5322.From header field > > > > Is RFC 5322 or 5322bis preferred? If 5322bis is preferred, this document > will be paused and moved with Cluster C540. > > > > —Files — > > > > XML file: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9989.xml > > > > Output files: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9989.txt > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9989.html > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9989.pdf > > > > Diffs: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9989-diff.html (comprehensive > diff) > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9989-rfcdiff.html (side by side) > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9989-lastdiff.html (last version > to this one) > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9989-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff > between last version and this) > > > >> On May 15, 2026, at 11:49 AM, Todd Herr <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> For the official record, I concur with John's two minor items here. > >> > >> On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 2:49 PM John R. Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I went through and found two minor items. I checked with Todd who agrees > >> with them. Other than that, ready to go. > >> > >> In 3.2.17, "PSD's policy" should instead be "PSO's policy". > >> > >> In B.2.2, the reference to RFC6591 reports should be to RFC9991 reports. > >> > >> I made a pull request if you want to use it. > >> > >> Regards, > >> John Levine, [email protected], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for > Dummies", > >> Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. > https://jl.ly > >> > >> On Wed, 13 May 2026, Alanna Paloma wrote: > >> > >>> Hello Todd and John, > >>> > >>> We have merged the updates. > >>> > >>> Additionally, we have further updated the ABNF in Section 4.8, as the > previously suggested update was 1 character over the 72-character limit. > >>> > >>> Current: > >>> dmarc-urilist = (dmarc-uri / obs-dmarc-uri) > >>> *(*WSP "," *WSP (dmarc-uri / obs-dmarc-uri)) > >>> > >>> Please review the XML file and its TXT, HTML, and PDF outputs, and let > us know if any changes are required or if you approve the RFC for > publication. We consider this your final assent that the document is ready > for publication. To request changes or approve your RFC for publication, > please reply to this email. Please use ‘REPLY ALL’, as all the parties CCed > on this message need to see your approval. > >>> > >>> XML file: > >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9989.xml > >>> > >>> Output files: > >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9989.txt > >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9989.html > >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9989.pdf > >>> > >>> Comprehensive diff file of the text: > >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9989-diff.html > >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9989-rfcdiff.html (side by side) > >>> > >>> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: > >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9989 > >>> > >>> Thank you, > >>> > >>> Alanna Paloma > >>> RFC Production Center > >>> > >>>> On May 12, 2026, at 11:22 AM, [email protected] wrote: > >>>> > >>>> *****IMPORTANT***** > >>>> > >>>> Updated 2026/05/12 > >>>> > >>>> RFC Author(s): > >>>> -------------- > >>>> > >>>> Your document has now entered AUTH48. > >>>> > >>>> AUTH48 is being handled in GitHub as part of the GitHub pilot test > (see > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=rpc-github-phase-0-pilot-test > ). > >>>> > >>>> Your document is available for review at: > >>>> https://github.com/rfc-editor/AUTH48-rfc9989 > >>>> > >>>> Please do the following: > >>>> > >>>> a) accept your invitations to join the repo as collaborators. > >>>> > >>>> b) see the README for details on the AUTH48 process: > >>>> https://github.com/rfc-editor/AUTH48-rfc9989/blob/Approved/README.md > >>>> > >>>> c) review and resolve the issues: > >>>> https://github.com/rfc-editor/AUTH48-rfc9989/issues > >>>> > >>>> Once the content is stable in GitHub, we will provide the updated XML > file and the output files for review and approval. > >>>> > >>>> You and your coauthors are responsible for engaging other parties > >>>> (e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before providing > >>>> your approval. > >>>> > >>>> Once the document has been reviewed and approved by all of the > authors, > >>>> it will be published as an RFC. If an author is no longer > >>>> available, there are several remedies available as listed in the > >>>> FAQ (https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/). > >>>> > >>>> Please let us know if you have any questions. > >>>> > >>>> Thank you for your cooperation, > >>>> > >>>> RFC Editor > >>>> > >>>> -------------------------------------- > >>>> RFC 9989 (draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-41) > >>>> > >>>> Title : Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, > and Conformance (DMARC) > >>>> Author(s) : T. Herr, Ed., J. Levine, Ed. > >>>> WG Chair(s) : Barry Leiba, Seth Blank > >>>> Area Director(s) : Andy Newton, Charles Eckel > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> Regards, > >> John Levine, [email protected], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for > Dummies", > >> Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. > https://jl.ly > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Todd > >> > > > > > > Regards, > John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY > Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly >
-- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
