Hi Ashesh,

Thank you for your reply! We have noted your approval here: 
https://queue.rfc-editor.org/final-review/rfc9986/. 

Now that we have all author approvals, we will move forward with IANA updates.

Thank you!

Madison Church
RFC Production Center

> On Jun 5, 2026, at 9:04 PM, Ashesh Mishra <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Thanks, Jeff. I reviewed the latest and it all looks good to me. 
> 
> Thanks,
> Ash
> 
> 
> Ashesh Mishra
> Head of Client Solutions
> 
> +1 (213) 300-0156
> www.aalyria.com
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2026 at 6:30 PM Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]> wrote:
> +ashesh at corrected address
> 
> On 6/4/26 17:00, Madison Church wrote:
> > Hi Sonal,
> >
> > Apologies for missing your earlier mail! We have noted your approval and 
> > updated your email and affiliation. See 
> > https://queue.rfc-editor.org/final-review/rfc9986/.
> >
> > Updated files are here:
> >     https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9986.txt
> >     https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9986.pdf
> >     https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9986.html
> >     https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9986.xml
> >
> > Diffs:
> >     https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9986-diff.html
> >     https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9986-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
> >     https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9986-auth48diff.html
> >     https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9986-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by 
> > side)
> >
> > Once we receive approval from Ashesh, we will ask IANA to update the "BFD 
> > Authentication Types" registry. Afterwards, this document (and RFC-to-be 
> > 9985) will move forward in the publication process.
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> > Madison Church
> > RFC Production Center
> >
> >> On Jun 4, 2026, at 3:38 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani <[email protected]> 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Madison,
> >>
> >> Sonal did respond with an approval and asked for her contact information 
> >> to be updated. Did you see it?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> p.s. Let me ping Ashesh.
> >>
> >>> On Jun 4, 2026, at 9:19 AM, Madison Church <[email protected]> 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Mahesh,
> >>>
> >>> Thank you for your reply! We have noted your approval here: 
> >>> https://queue.rfc-editor.org/final-review/rfc9986/.
> >>>
> >>> Once we receive approvals from Ashesh and Sonal, we will move this 
> >>> document forward in the publication process.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you!
> >>>
> >>> Madison Church
> >>> RFC Production Center
> >>>
> >>>> On Jun 3, 2026, at 7:07 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani 
> >>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Madison,
> >>>>
> >>>> I am not sure if I sent my approval already, but here it is, in case I 
> >>>> missed sending it
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks.
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Jun 2, 2026, at 12:00 PM, Madison Church 
> >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Alan, *Ketan,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> *Ketan - We have noted your approval for moving RFC 8341 to the 
> >>>>> Normative References section.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Alan - Thank you for your reply! We have updated the document per your 
> >>>>> response and noted your approval on the Final Review (formerly AUTH48) 
> >>>>> status page; see https://queue.rfc-editor.org/final-review/rfc9986/.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The files have been posted here (please refresh):
> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9986.txt
> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9986.pdf
> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9986.html
> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9986.xml
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Updated diff files have been posted here:
> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9986-diff.html
> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9986-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9986-auth48diff.html
> >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9986-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by 
> >>>>> side)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Once we receive approval from Mahesh, Sonal, and Ashesh, we will move 
> >>>>> this document forward in the publication process.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank you!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Madison Church
> >>>>> RFC Production Center
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Jun 2, 2026, at 11:27 AM, Alan DeKok <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On May 29, 2026, at 4:47 PM, Madison Church 
> >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> 17) <!-- [rfced] For the "[ISAAC_]" reference, we recommend 
> >>>>>>>>> changing the citation
> >>>>>>>>> tag since "[ISAAC]" and "[ISAAC_]" may be easily confused. May we 
> >>>>>>>>> update
> >>>>>>>>> "[ISAAC_]" to "[ISAAC+]" or "[ISAAC-Plus]"?
> >>>>>>>>> -->
> >>>>>>>> This question to be answered by Alan and the SEC-ADs.
> >>>>>>> [rfced] We will wait for further guidance from Alan before proceeding 
> >>>>>>> with any updates for the "[ISAAC_]" reference.
> >>>>>> This should be "[ISAAC-Plus]" for clarity.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [rfced] After further review, we have decided to use "sequence 
> >>>>>>> number" and "secret key" in this document for consistency across RFC 
> >>>>>>> 5880 and RFC-to-be 9985 (this excludes instances where the terms are 
> >>>>>>> paired with another noun, e.g., "Sequence Number field"). Please let 
> >>>>>>> us know any objections.
> >>>>>> This is fine.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Meticulous Keyed ISAAC
> >>>>>>>>> Meticulous keyed ISAAC
> >>>>>>>> The forms I see these in are paired to the sha-1 and md-5 forms of 
> >>>>>>>> the mode.  We are looking for consistency for those pairings.  The 
> >>>>>>>> capitalization for keyed can match the other instances.
> >>>>>>>>> Meticulous Keyed ISAAC Keyed
> >>>>>>>>> [Note: Is the second "Keyed" correct here? There are 4 instances.]
> >>>>>>>> These instances look like a search and replace issue.  I believe the 
> >>>>>>>> intention here is that each of these instances is intended to be 
> >>>>>>>> "Meticulous Keyed ISAAC, ISAAC format".  This should be audited by 
> >>>>>>>> Alan.
> >>>>>>> [rfced] We will wait for further guidance from Alan before making the 
> >>>>>>> updates as described above for "Meticulous Keyed ISAAC Keyed". We 
> >>>>>>> have updated all other terms for consistency.
> >>>>>> Yes.  The 4 instances can be changed to "Meticulous Keyed ISAAC, ISAAC 
> >>>>>> format".
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Alan DeKok.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Mahesh Jethanandani
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >> Mahesh Jethanandani
> >> [email protected]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>

-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to