Hi Authors and Paul, Paul - We have noted AD approval here: https://queue.rfc-editor.org/final-review/rfc9955/
All - We have now received all necessary approvals and consider Final Review complete. Thank you for your attention and guidance during the Final Review process. We will move this document forward in the publication process at this time. Best regards, Alanna Paloma RFC Production Center > On Jul 9, 2026, at 5:01 PM, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2026 at 1:27 PM Alanna Paloma <[email protected]> > wrote: > > As the previous AD on this document, I have read the changes, including > Section 5, and I approve all changes (if as previous SEC AD, I would > have those powers) > > Paul > > > Hi Chris, > > This is a friendly reminder that we need your verification of the added > text in Section 5. > > See this diff file: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955-auth48diff.html > [rfc-editor.org] > > Thank you, > Alanna Paloma > RFC Production Center > > > On Jun 30, 2026, at 4:11 PM, Alanna Paloma > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Britta, > > > > Thank you for sending you approval. It’s been noted here: > > https://queue.rfc-editor.org/final-review/rfc9955/ > [queue.rfc-editor.org] > > > > We will leave your email address as is within the document. > > > > Best regards, > > Alanna Paloma > > RFC Production Center > > > > > >> On Jun 30, 2026, at 3:57 PM, Hale, Britta J HQE (USA) > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Greetings, > >> > >> Thank you for reaching out. I approve of the changes. > >> > >> Please continue to keep the "@nps.edu [nps.edu]" email as the one > listed on the RFC. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Britta > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Alanna Paloma <[email protected]> > >>> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2026 3:40 PM > >>> To: Hale, Britta J HQE (USA) <[email protected]> > >>> Cc: Paul Hoffman <[email protected]>; Hale, Britta (CIV) > >>> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Flo D > >>> <[email protected]>; Nina Bindel <[email protected]>; pquip- > >>> [email protected]; [email protected]; Paul Wouters > <[email protected]>; > >>> auth48archive <[email protected]>; RFC Editor > <rfc-editor@rfc- > >>> editor.org [editor.org]>; Deirdre Connolly <[email protected]> > >>> Subject: Re: [Ext] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9955 > <draft-ietf-pquip-hybrid- > >>> signature-spectrums-07> for your review > >>> > >>> [You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn > why this is > >>> important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification [aka.ms] ] > >>> > >>> Hi Britta, > >>> > >>> We’re reaching out to you at this email address, per Datatracker, as > your > >>> nps.edu [nps.edu] <http://nps.edu/ [nps.edu]> address doesn’t seem > to be working. > >>> > >>> Please review and approve of the updated files below. Once we > receive your > >>> approval, we will move this document forward in the publication > process. > >>> > >>> The files have been posted here (please refresh): > >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955.xml [rfc-editor.org] > >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955.txt [rfc-editor.org] > >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955.html [rfc-editor.org] > >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955.pdf [rfc-editor.org] > >>> > >>> The relevant diff files have been posted here: > >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955-diff.html > [rfc-editor.org] (comprehensive diff) > >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955-auth48diff.html > [rfc-editor.org] (Final Review > >>> changes) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955-auth48rfcdiff.html > [rfc-editor.org] (Final > >>> Review changes side by side) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9955- [rfc-editor.org] > >>> lastdiff.html (last version to this one) https://www.rfc- [rfc-] > >>> editor.org/authors/rfc9955-lastrfcdiff.html [editor.org] (rfcdiff > between last version and > >>> this) > >>> > >>> For the Final Review status of this document, please see: > >>> https://queue.rfc-editor.org/final-review/rfc9955/ > [queue.rfc-editor.org] > >>> > >>> Thank you, > >>> Alanna Paloma > >>> RFC Production Center > >>> > >>>> On Jun 30, 2026, at 2:46 PM, Alanna Paloma > <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi Paul > >>>> > >>>> Thank you for sending over the snapshot. Unfortunately, we cannot > confirm > >>> Britta's approval yet, as it doesn't show who is conversing. Any > chance you can > >>> ask her to send us her approval directly? Otherwise, we may ask > Chris to > >>> approve in her absence. > >>>> > >>>> Is <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> a working > address? > >>> Alternatively, would <[email protected] > >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> (per Datatracker) be better? > >>>> > >>>> Best regards, > >>>> Alanna Paloma > >>>> RFC Production Center > >>>> > >>>>> On Jun 29, 2026, at 5:31 PM, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> On Jun 29, 2026, at 17:10, Alanna Paloma > <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Additionally, as much as possible, we’d like to have an > indication of Britta’s > >>> approval in our archives; any chance you can send us a snapshot of > her > >>> approval? If this is problematic, perhaps Chris could give approval > on her > >>> behalf. We would prefer to avoid exception cases to the approval > process > >>> when possible. > >>>>> > >>>>> I love the idea of snapshots as proof! See attached. > >>>>> > >>>>> --Paul Hoffman > >>>>> <britta-approval.png> > >>>> > >> > > > > > -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
