RFC Editor: 

We've completed the actions for the following RFC-to-be: 

draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-integrity-20

ACTION 1:

We've added the following entries to the IOAM Option-Type registry:

64 IOAM Integrity-Protected Pre-allocated Trace Option-Type Pre-allocated Trace 
with Integrity Protection [RFC-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-integrity-20, Section 4]
65 IOAM Integrity-Protected Incremental Trace Option-Type Incremental Trace 
with Integrity Protection [RFC-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-integrity-20, Section 4]
66 IOAM Integrity-Protected POT Option-Type POT with Integrity Protection 
[RFC-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-integrity-20, Section 4]
67 IOAM Integrity-Protected E2E Option-Type E2E with Integrity Protection 
[RFC-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-integrity-20, Section 4]

Please see
https://www.iana.org/assignments/ioam

ACTION 2:

We've created the following registry and placed in the "In Situ OAM (IOAM)" 
registry group:

IOAM Integrity Protection Methods
Registration Procedure(s): IETF Review
Reference: [RFC-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-integrity-20]

ID Description Protected Header Fields Reference
0x00 AES-GMAC, 16-octet (full) Authentication Tag, 12-octet Initialization 
Vector. Pre-allocated Trace and Incremental Trace:
- Namespace-ID (mask = 0xffff)
- NodeLen + Flags + RemainingLen (mask = 0xfb00)
- IOAM Trace-Type (mask = 0xffffff)
- Reserved (mask = 0x00)

POT:
- Namespace-ID (mask = 0xffff)
- IOAM-POT-Type (mask = 0xff)
- IOAM-POT-Flags (mask = 0x00)

E2E:
- Namespace-ID (mask = 0xffff)
- IOAM-E2E-Type (mask = 0xffff)
[RFC-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-integrity-20, Section 5]
0x01-0xFE Unassigned
0xFF Reserved [RFC-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-integrity-20]

Please see
https://www.iana.org/assignments/ioam

Please let us know when an RFC number has been assigned and the date of 
publication by sending a new message to <[email protected]>. 

Thanks, 

Sabrina Tanamal
IANA 

-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to