Hi rfc-editor,

Thanks for this mail.
Please find my replies inline.


Thanks,
Changwang (On behalf of co-authors)


发件人: [email protected] <[email protected]>
发送时间: 2026年8月7日 21:23
收件人: linchangwang (RD) <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]
抄送: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
主题: Document intake questions about draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sr-epe-over-l2bundle



Author(s),

Congratulations, your document has been successfully added to the RFC Editor 
queue!
The team at the RFC Production Center (RPC) is looking forward to working with 
you as your document moves forward toward publication. To help reduce 
processing time and improve editing accuracy, please respond to the questions 
below. Please confer with your coauthors (or authors of other documents if your 
document is in a
cluster) as necessary prior to taking action in order to streamline 
communication.
If your document has multiple authors, only one author needs to reply to this 
message.

As you read through the rest of this email:

* If you need/want to make updates to your document, we encourage you to make 
those changes and resubmit to the Datatracker. This allows for the easy 
creation of diffs, which facilitates review by interested parties (e.g., 
authors, ADs, doc shepherds).

* If you feel no updates to the document are necessary, please reply with any 
applicable rationale/comments.


Please note that the RPC team will not work on your document until we receive a 
reply.  We require a reply, even if you don’t have guidance or don’t feel that 
you need to make any updates to the document.  After we hear from you, your 
document will start moving through the queue. You will be able to review and 
approve our updates during Final Review (formerly AUTH48).

Please feel free to contact us with any questions you may have at 
[email protected].

Thank you!
The RPC Team

--

1) As there may have been multiple updates made to the document during Last 
Call, please review the current version of the document:

* Is the text in the Abstract still accurate?

* Are the Authors' Addresses, Contributors, and Acknowledgments sections 
current?

Changwang:  The text and the addresses are accurate.


2) Please share any style information that could help us with editing your 
document. For example:

* Is your document's format or its terminology based on another document, WG 
style guide, etc.? If so, please provide a pointer to that information (e.g., 
"This document's terminology should match DNS terminology in RFC 9499." or 
"This document uses the style info at 
<https://httpwg.org/admin/editors/style-guide>.").

* Is there a general pattern of capitalization or formatting of terms that 
editors can follow (e.g., "Field names should have initial capitalization."
or  "Parameter names should be in double quotes." or "<tt/> should be used for 
token names." etc.)?

Changwang:  The terminology in this document should be consistent with  
[RFC9085] and [RFC9086].


3) Please carefully review the entries and their URLs in the References section 
with the following in mind. Note that we will update as follows unless we hear 
otherwise at this time:

* References to obsoleted RFCs will be updated to point to the current RFC on 
the topic in accordance with Section 4.8.6 of RFC 7322 (RFC Style Guide).

* References to I-Ds that have been replaced by another I-D will be updated to 
point to the replacement I-D.

* References to documents from other organizations that have been superseded 
will be updated to their superseding version.

Note: To check for outdated RFC and I-D references, you can use idnits 
<https://author-tools.ietf.org/idnits>.

Changwang:  We agree with the standard updates for the references as proposed.


4) Is there any text that requires special handling? For example:

* Are there any sections that were contentious when the document was drafted?

* Are any sections that need to be removed before publication marked as such 
(e.g., Implementation Status sections (per RFC 7942))?

* Are there any instances of repeated text/sections that should be edited the 
same way?

Changwang:  There is no contentious text requiring special handling.


5) Because this document updates RFCs 9085 and 9086, please review the reported 
errata and confirm whether they have been addressed in this document or are not 
relevant:

* RFC 9085 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/rfc9085)

Changwang:  The reported errata is unrelated to this document.


6)  Would you like to participate in the RPC Pilot Test for editing in 
kramdown-rfc?
If so, please let us know and provide a self-contained kramdown-rfc file. For 
more information about this experiment, see:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=pilot_test_kramdown_rfc.

Changwang:  Thank you for the invitation, but we will not be participating in 
the RPC pilot test at this time.


7) Would you like to participate in the RPC Pilot Test for completing Final 
Review in GitHub? If so, please let us know and provide all author, AD, and/or 
document shepherd GitHub usernames. For more information about this experiment, 
see:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=rpc-github-phase-0-pilot-test.

Changwang:  We will not be participating in the RPC pilot test at this time.


8) Is there anything else that the RPC should be aware of while editing this 
document?

Changwang:  There are no other items the RPC should be aware of at this time.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
本邮件及其附件含有新华三集团的保密信息,仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群组。
禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用(包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发)本邮件中的信息。
如果您错收了本邮件,请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本邮件!
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from New H3C, 
which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above.
Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not 
limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by 
persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited.
If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email 
immediately and delete it!
-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to