Apologies for the last-minute changes. With them applied, I approve publication.
Thanks,
Corey
From: Joe Mandel < mailto:[email protected] >
To: "Tomofumi Okubo"< mailto:[email protected] >
Cc: "Michael StJohns"< mailto:[email protected] >, "Alice Russo"<
mailto:[email protected] >, "Russ Housley"<
mailto:[email protected] >, " mailto:[email protected] "<
mailto:[email protected] >, "Corey Bonnell"<
mailto:[email protected] >, "
mailto:[email protected] "< mailto:[email protected] >, "
mailto:[email protected] "< mailto:[email protected] >,
" mailto:[email protected] "< mailto:[email protected] >, "
mailto:[email protected] "< mailto:[email protected] >, "
mailto:[email protected] "< mailto:[email protected] >, "
mailto:[email protected] "< mailto:[email protected] >, "
mailto:[email protected] "< mailto:[email protected] >,
" mailto:[email protected] "< mailto:[email protected] >, "
mailto:[email protected] "< mailto:[email protected] >
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 16:01:36 -0400
Subject: Re: files available - Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 10031
(draft-ietf-lamps-macaddress-on) in markdown/GitHub
I approve the changes.
Joe
On Aug 11, 2026, at 7:34 AM, Tomofumi Okubo < mailto:[email protected] >
wrote:
I'm fine with the changes too.
Cheers,
Tomofumi
From: Michael StJohns < mailto:[email protected] >
Sent: Tuesday, 11 August 2026 07:42:14
To: Alice Russo < mailto:[email protected] >
Cc: Russ Housley < mailto:[email protected] >;
mailto:[email protected] < mailto:[email protected] >; Corey
Bonnell < mailto:[email protected] >;
mailto:[email protected] < mailto:[email protected] >;
mailto:[email protected] < mailto:[email protected] >;
mailto:[email protected] < mailto:[email protected] >;
mailto:[email protected] < mailto:[email protected] >;
mailto:[email protected] < mailto:[email protected] >;
mailto:[email protected] < mailto:[email protected] >;
mailto:[email protected] < mailto:[email protected] >;
mailto:[email protected] < mailto:[email protected] >;
mailto:[email protected] < mailto:[email protected] >;
mailto:[email protected] < mailto:[email protected] >
Subject: Re: files available - Re: Final Review: RFC-to-be 10031
(draft-ietf-lamps-macaddress-on) in markdown/GitHub
I'm also fine with the most recent changes from Corey... strangely I
thought all of those were things we caught earlier... *sigh*
Thanks - Mike
On 8/10/2026 19:04, Alice Russo wrote:
> Russ and Mike,
>
> Updated accordingly. Files are in the same locations (please refresh):
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10031.txt
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10031.html
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10031.pdf
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10031.xml (source)
>
> Comprehensive diff file of the text:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10031-diff.html
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10031-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
>
> Only the most recent set of changes - i.e., Corey's PRs*:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10031-lastrfcdiff.html (side by
>side)
>
> Your approvals have been recorded here based on your earlier reply,
> but please review the most recent changes:
> https://queue.rfc-editor.org/final-review/rfc10031/
>
> * See
> https://github.com/rfc-editor-drafts/FinalReview-rfc10031/pull/12
> https://github.com/rfc-editor-drafts/FinalReview-rfc10031/pull/13
>
> We await word from your coauthors regarding this document's readiness
> for publication as an RFC.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Alice Russo
> RFC Production Center
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 11:12 AM Michael StJohns <
> mailto:[email protected] > wrote:
>> With the exception of Russ' note on <CODE...> markers, I'm good with
>> this. Thanks for all the hard work!
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> On 8/10/2026 11:50, Russ Housley wrote:
>>> Alice;
>>>
>>> Looks good to me. Can we add <CODE BEGINS> and <CODE ENDS> markers in
>>> Section 6. Sorry that I did not norice they were missing earlier.
>>>
>>> Russ
>>>
>>>> On Aug 10, 2026, at 11:43 AM, Alice Russo <
>>>> mailto:[email protected] > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Russ,
>>>> Good catch. The files have been corrected and posted here (please
>>>> refresh):
>>>>
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10031.txt
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10031.html
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10031.pdf
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10031.xml (source)
>>>>
>>>> Comprehensive diff file of the text:
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10031-diff.html
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10031-rfcdiff.html (side by
>>>>side)
>>>>
>>>> Only the most recent changes:
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10031-lastrfcdiff.html (side
>>>>by side)
>>>>
>>>> FYI, line breaks were added in 3 lines (listed below) where the
>>>> line-length limit was exceeded.
>>>>
>>>> rfc10031.xml(166): Warning: Too long line found (L325), 8 characters
>>>> longer than 72 characters:
>>>> // e.g., we can add mask bits to the current set, we can not
>>>>remove them
>>>> rfc10031.xml(166): Warning: Too long line found (L329), 17 characters
>>>> longer than 72 characters:
>>>> // e.g., we can't change the values of the live bits from the
>>>> superior constraint
>>>> rfc10031.xml(201): Warning: Too long line found (L361), 6 characters
>>>> longer than 72 characters:
>>>> // This logic can be used for both MACAddress and iPAddress OtherName
>>>>types
>>>>
>>>> Alice Russo
>>>> RFC Production Center
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Aug 8, 2026 at 9:12 PM Russ Housley < mailto:[email protected]
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> In Section 5: s/RFC 100031/RFC 10031/
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 7, 2026, at 1:55 PM, mailto:[email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Authors,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Summary: We've completed the GitHub portion; please review the files
>>>>>> (links below) and email your approval.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Details:
>>>>>> We merged the updates, converted the kramdown-rfc file to RFCXML, and
>>>>>> made minor updates (removed "-latest" in the docName attribute; removed
>>>>>> the comment containing the markdown-source hash).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please review the XML file and its TXT, HTML, and PDF outputs, and let
>>>>>> us know if any changes are required or if you approve the RFC for
>>>>>> publication. We consider this your final assent that the document is
>>>>>> ready for publication. To request changes or
approve your RFC for publication, please reply to this email. Please use
‘REPLY ALL’, as all the parties CCed on this message need to see your approval.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note that we will only make changes in the XML file from this point on.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> XML file:
>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10031.xml
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Output files:
>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10031.txt
>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10031.html
>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10031.pdf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Comprehensive diff file of the text:
>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10031-diff.html
>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc10031-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For the Final Review status of this document, please see:
>>>>>> https://queue.rfc-editor.org/final-review/rfc10031
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alice Russo
>>>>>> RFC Production Center
>>
--
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
