Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
> Well, IIRC that's the way I have done them (or something similar) except > the one for Base, which I forgot to do that way. So obviously it's a good > idea. :-)
I just took a look at them. The subtitles are a bit less consistent than they could be:
Heh, you're quite right. Obviously I hadn't got around to implementing my good idea. :-)
* Introduction to OpenOffice.org's Spreadsheet Component * The presentation component of OpenOffice.org * The OpenOffice.org Equation Editor * Extract from "OpenOffice.org Macros Explained"
The first two feel a bit wordy. I like the format of the third. I don't know what to suggest for the fourth.
Well, macros aren't a "component" so that one doesn't need to be consistent with the others.
I agree that the first two are rather wordy.
So, maybe we can re-write the subtitles as:
* OpenOffice.org's Word Processor * OpenOffice.org's Spreadsheet * OpenOffice.org's Presentations * OpenOffice.org's Vector Graphics * OpenOffice.org's Database * OpenOffice.org's Equation Editor
Just a thought.
I like that, though I wonder if the word "component" shouldn't be in there, as in "OpenOffice.org's Spreadsheet Component". I can't decide.
Thanks, Daniel, for bringing this up and especially for spotting the inconsistencies in what I have now.
Cheers, Jean
