Hi Perry,
Welcome aboard! Good to have you here. I'll try to answer some of your
questions.
Perry Spiller wrote:
I can do it on my PC (Windows 2k). Space is not an issue.
However, when I went to the link you provided, I was a bit
confused. I thought that I read on a page - yesterday - that
only stable builds were being used for Manual purposes. Am
I missing something? Your comment (above) refers to a beta.
Please clarify that for me before I download the wrong file!
We use the stable release to *write* the guide (because, because it's
stable. :-) But the guide covers OOo 2.0. So, if you wish to verify the
factual accuracy of the document, you need to grab the beta. But of
course, there's no requirement that you do that. You could just focus on
another aspect of a review. For example, when I review chapters I focus
on whether it is clearly explained. Other reviewers tend to focus on
different things.
One comment: I have abundant ignorance available. (Not joking)
I have always found that s/ware analysis is best done by an idiot.
As in someone confronting the program for the first time. A user
with experience has too many sub-conscious presumptions. I have
used OO a few times, but that's all. If I can start on v2 from scratch,
I'm more likely to spot lapses in instructional sequences.
Indeed. I have learned that my own ignorance has been very valuable when
reviewing other people's chapters. For precisely the reasons you state. :-)
Good to have you here Perry. Thank you for comming to help.
Cheers,
Daniel.
