Sigrid Kronenberger wrote:
Yes, the jpeg looks good. But I would prefer the file with the number (6) (the png-file). I have the feeling, that it's loaded very fast (and that, though I'm only using a dial-up-connection).
The PNG file in -6- is indexed, and is the same size ad the jpeg in -5-, both of which are a tiny bit smaller than the jpeg in -4-. I think that the PNG is also interlaced which makes it look like it's loading faster than it really is : )
Later I'll try Nicu's suggestion for the other way of making indexed files. Cheers, Daniel.
