Am Wed, 20 Jul 2005 18:02:14 -0400 Linda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > > > >I'm also not a lawyer, but I guess, since the first drafts of these > >chapters have already been under the PDL, (the license-change was > >during writing the different chapters) I would say, that we don't > >need to ask them once again... > > > >This is just *my* opinion. > > > > > >Sigrid > > > > > I guess it is still my question. We agreed to the PDL for the old > content, then we said no the CC for revised and new content. So > technically the new revised content is only under the CC lic. None of > the new content falls under the PDL since we made the change for V2 if > I am understanding this correctly. If this is true then we would need > approval for the content to be used under the PDL. But I guess, this should be quite easy, because we had from most authors the actual email-addresses... And when we explain the situation to them, I can't imagine, that we receive a "no" as answer. Sigrid
