Hello @all, Am Wed, 20 Jul 2005 08:01:55 +0100 Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Last weekend Christian Lohmaier and Ian Lynch came up with an > interesting idea regarding the user guide license. The idea is that we > keep using our current, easy-to-use license (GPL/CC) but allow OOo to > use our work under the PDL as "original documentation". The "initial > writers" section would contain the people listed under "Authors". > > The point is, we wouldn't need to track changes or do the other things > that made the PDL inconvenient. We also wouldn't need to change > template again, or change our documents. I can just add a note to the > user guide folder to this effect. > > I am not a lawyer, but to me this looks like a win-win scenario. We > keep the benefits of our current license system, while letting OOo use > the work under the PDL if they want. > Is there now a final decision for this solution? (I only remember one -1, the rest says +1). If we say "yes", I will send the solution to the native-lang-mailinglist and tell them, that they can use our documents under the PDL. Linda, what's about your questions and doubts? Are they already cleared? Or are there any questions left? I think, we should come to an end :) Sigrid
