On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 12:21 -0500, Dan Lewis wrote: > > > > Are we suppose to use this to verify and author the documentation or > > Beta 130? > > > > Thanks, > > Linda > > I have already installed the 2.0 RC1. If someone would remind me of > the key combinations needed to see what the 1.9.x value is and report > back.
According to the "2.0.0rc1 Release Candidate1 - Release Notes" page: "these notes contains changes between SRC680_m130 and OOO680_m1. this release will install as OpenOffice.org 2.0.0 Sources can be received from cvs by tag OOO680_m1" So RC1 is apparently developer build m1. Read this here: http://development.openoffice.org/releases/2.0.0rc.html -- Regards, Rick Barnes www.nostabo.net Read my blog: http://www.nostabo.net/blog/index.php ******************************************************************* PRIVILEGED - PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL This electronic mail is solely for the use of the addressee and may contain information which is confidential or privileged. If you receive this electronic mail in error, please delete it from your system immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or using any of the contact details noted herein. This e-mail sent via Evolution 2.2.3 running on a Linux 2.6.13 kernel.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
