Sigrid, Thank you.
I suspect this is true, because the package numbers for RC-4 were ...2.0.1-145..., and the package numbers for "RC-5" are ...2.0.1-1... . For users of Debian-based distributions, note that the package numbering will cause dpkg to interpret installing the latest packages as downgrading. I allowed the "downgrade" to proceed and it worked properly. Newer packages replaced older ones, and all programs appear to work normally. "Help > About ..." reports the version as "OpenOffice.org 2.0 ... Build-1 (Sat Dec 17 17:47:04 CET 2005)". (I wish they'd be consistent about this. If they're going to call this release 2.0.1 that's what "...About" should report.) Kevin On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:02:20 +0100 Sigrid Kronenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > Kevin McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > > New tarballs are available here: > > > > http://ftp.linux.cz/pub/localization/OpenOffice.org/devel/680/2.0.1-RC5/ > > > > I'm a little confused about whether this is a new release candidate or > > the real thing, but it's the latest available. > > I've heard on the German dev-list, that the RC5 for the English version > has become the stable version. I haven't heard anything about other > language builds. > > Sigrid
