Andre, Thank you for pointing me to the voting; I was not aware such a mechanism existed.
I have voted in this matter; to whom should I address more detailed comments? Kevin On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 23:41:28 +0100 Andre Schnabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Kevin McKinley schrieb: > > >I suspect this is true, because the package numbers for RC-4 were > >...2.0.1-145..., and the package numbers for "RC-5" are ...2.0.1-1... . > > > > > Well, it is true .. but for other reasons. (Nobody knows, if a RC would > become final, when the RC is built. We only know, after the RC has > passed the tests.) > > >"Help > About ..." reports the version as "OpenOffice.org 2.0 ... > >Build-1 (Sat Dec 17 17:47:04 CET 2005)". (I wish they'd be consistent > >about this. If they're going to call this release 2.0.1 that's what > >"...About" should report.) > > > > > Who is "they". I thought, we all are working for OOo, building one > community. > > BTW: you can express yourself by voting on this issue: > http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850 > > André
