Thanks for catching the colour/color discrepancy.

Regarding dialog (box), the Getting Started book use "dialog", NOT "dialog box", because I (the editor of that book) want the books to be consistent with the usage in the program itself. However, Gary, the Writer Guide editor, insists on "dialog box" among other things that don't agree with the program (checkbox/check box, for example). Arguing about this and other matters is just a waste of everyone's time, and it's obvious that neither of us is going to give in to the other's POV, so...

My compromise is to use the WG style when working on the WG (and my preferred style in the GS book and -- I think -- in the Draw Guide), but occasionally I slip up. The chapter on Setting up Writer is a conspicuous case: some of it is otherwise identical between GS and WG, except for a few of these usage issues. :-)

BTW, I'm trying to solve the checkbox/check box issue by rewording to use the term "option" if any designation is required -- which often is not necessary, IMO. Similarly, we avoid the problem of differences between US and UK punctuation with quotation marks by not using quote marks before a comma or full stop. :-)

For historical background info: at one time (several years) consistency wasn't enforced between chapters of a book (only within individual chapters), so having whole books made internally consistent is quite a change.

--Jean


Sak wrote:
I went ahead and reverted my crazy italics style changes to what they were, and uploaded a new document to the site. My goof, so I figured I'd save someone a few minutes having to reject those changes. ;)

In regards to Gary's suggestion concerning "dialog" versus "dialog box" I also made a couple changes there as well, adding "box" behind dialog. I agree that it makes a bit more sense, in this context, than having "dialog" hanging out there by itself. His also mentioning the spelling difference between UK and US reminded me of a paragraph I changed in the document in those respects--though it was colour/color that was changed. The rest of the document was using the US version, "color," and since that paragraph was the only with UK spelling I changed it to US for the sake of uniformity.

Anyhow, thanks for all your patience while I'm still trying to get the hang of things here. Like once again mis-labeling the subject line of this email: "Ch3" when the document is "Ch2." I guess I had chapter 3 on the brain since I was thinking about diving into it next. :)

Thanks,
Sak.

Gary Schnabl wrote:
I thought the (tabbed) pages were in bold when they were to be selected (pushed...); otherwise (when not selected), I forget...

Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
Gary Schnabl wrote:
In the past, dialog box names used default character styles. If any were not, then those would be in error.

Although the names of the dialog boxes themselves are supposed to be in the normal character style, the names of the individual *pages* or *tabs* of the dialog boxes were in italics, were they not? Sak may be talking about those.

--Jean

Sak wrote:

First, the use of italics for naming dialog windows was implemented in some places but not others. I went ahead and italicized the other places, but I didn't see anything in the Style Guide about whether this was a preferred method or not. I'd be curious to know what your thoughts are on this for future revisions or documents that I'm working on.




Reply via email to