Hello Benoit, * Benoit SIGOURE wrote on Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 01:35:38PM CEST: > On Oct 1, 2007, at 1:30 PM, Benoit SIGOURE wrote: > >> By the way, I have a question to the list, AC_CANONICAL_HOST implies >> AC_CANONICAL_BUILD, maybe this should be mentionned in the documentation? > > Proposed (trivial) patch attached.
Why is the analogous relation with AC_CANONICAL_TARGET not documented in the patch? But also, why do we want to document this at all? It's not that having the user specify all of these macros is a disadvantage, no? There are lots of macro dependencies we (consciously) chose not to document, and while maybe not for this specific one, I also don't see a compelling reason to do otherwise here; but I certainly don't have a strong opinion at all. Cheers, Ralf
