On Oct 1, 2007, at 2:22 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Benoit,* Benoit SIGOURE wrote on Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 01:35:38PM CEST:On Oct 1, 2007, at 1:30 PM, Benoit SIGOURE wrote:By the way, I have a question to the list, AC_CANONICAL_HOST impliesAC_CANONICAL_BUILD, maybe this should be mentionned in the documentation?Proposed (trivial) patch attached.Why is the analogous relation with AC_CANONICAL_TARGET not documented in the patch?But also, why do we want to document this at all? It's not that havingthe user specify all of these macros is a disadvantage, no? There are lots of macro dependencies we (consciously) chose not to document, and while maybe not for this specific one, I also don't see a compellingreason to do otherwise here; but I certainly don't have a strong opinionat all.
Because you can be surprised to see: checking build system type... i386-apple-darwin8.10.1 checking host system type... i386-apple-darwin8.10.1 checking build system type... (cached) i386-apple-darwin8.10.1even though it doesn't harm. But if you want to keep this as an internal detail, fair enough.
Cheers, -- Benoit Sigoure aka Tsuna EPITA Research and Development Laboratory
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
