Re: Autoconf fails to install without help2man

[Akim Demaille]

>>>>> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
F

Akim> IMHO the right patch is to teach `help2man' to `missing'.

Alexandre> Or adjust autoconf's Makefiles to proceed even if help2man
Alexandre> fails.

Hm, I don't understand: my understanding of `missing' is that you can
write your Makefile rules as if help2man existed.  And if help2man
exists, I want `make' to fail when help2man fails, so it is up to
`missing' to trap this, not the Makefile.  Isn't it?

        Akim