Earnie Boyd wrote:
>
> --- Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I fully support making "docdir" a separate directory that defaults to
> > `${prefix}/doc' -- after all, this has been reality for years. But I'd
> > like to see this taken further: make "info" a subdirectory of "doc", make
> > "man" a subdirectory of "doc", make "dvi" a subdirectory of "doc", make
> > "html" a subdirectory of "doc", in short put all the documentation into
> > "doc". The last thing I want is each documentation format claiming its
> > own major directory in the file system.
> >
>
> I really like this idea. It's bothered me for some time but I've never
> addressed it.
>
I like the idea too but how long will my manpath be now? One for bison,
one for flex, one for autoconf, one for ...
Regards
David
- Re: HTML format documentation Richard Stallman
- Re: HTML format documentation Alexandre Oliva
- Re: HTML format documentation Akim Demaille
- Re: HTML format documentation Lars J. Aas
- Re: HTML format documentation Akim Demaille
- Re: HTML format documentation Peter Eisentraut
- Re: HTML format documentation Paul D. Smith
- Re: HTML format documentation Alexandre Oliva
- Re: HTML format documentation Richard Stallman
- Re: HTML format documentation Earnie Boyd
- Re: [autoconf] HTML format documentation David Morgan
- Re: [autoconf] HTML format documentation R�diger Kuhlmann
- Re: HTML format documentation Earnie Boyd
- Re: HTML format documentation Earnie Boyd
- Re: HTML format documentation Greg A. Woods
- Re: HTML format documentation Earnie Boyd
- Re: HTML format documentation Earnie Boyd
- Re: HTML format documentation Akim Demaille
