On Dec 14, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | % i586-cygwin32-gcc tmp.c > | % ls *.exe > | a.exe > Yipeeeeeeee| Hey Alexandre, did you see that!?! Yep. I knew about it. I even mentioned this fact a few days ago: GCC on MS-Windows will generate a.exe instead of a.out. The problem is that a.out and a.exe are outside the file name space of autoconf. The user might well have an a.exe program in their tree that they wouldn't want configure to overwrite/remove. Maybe we should just rule the user shouldn't have a program named `a' and be done with it? -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Mo DeJong
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Mo DeJong
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Mo DeJong
- RE: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Bernard Dautrevaux
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Akim Demaille
- RE: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Earnie Boyd
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Lars J. Aas
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Earnie Boyd
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Alexandre Oliva
