Re: Expanded rules for scripts

[Pavel Roskin]

Hello!

Let's finally move the discussion from autoconf-pathes.

> Well there was much left in ``properly''.  My understanding was that
> Pavel found a host where make was very happy with just those suffix
> rules, but broken when we introduced extra dependencies.  I don't
> remember whether it was
>
> .sh: configure.in
>         # do sth

Even GNU make would not let you do it.

> .sh: configure.in
>         # do sth
> autoconf.sh: some-other-dependency

This was used in Autoconf.

Regards,
Pavel Roskin