On Dec 15, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | > > .sh: configure.in
> | > > # do sth
> | >
> | > Even GNU make would not let you do it.
> |
> | This is indeed definitely wrong and I don't know of any make where I've seen
> | this working but, to be honest, discovering once it was not working I
> | stopped trying :-)
> I must be missing something: why is it that clear it's wrong?
It's not really wrong, it just doesn't do what you want.
It means ``build the file named .sh out of configure.in'', not ``build
%.sh out of %, with the additional dependency on configure.in''. I
think :-)
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
