On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 03:29:34PM +0100, Akim Demaille wrote:
>
> Would someone see a problem if I adjust Autoconf to support
> configure.ac in addition to configure.in? I think `.in' was a very
> bad name (which in addition introduces an undesirable confusion
> between autoconf instantiation and config.status instantiation).
Why not allow both for the next release, but print a warning that
tells the user configure.in is deprecated when they use it?
Cheers,
Gary.
--
___ _ ___ __ _ mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ __|__ _ _ ___ _| | / / | / /_ _ _ _ __ _| |_ __ _ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| (_ / _` | '_|// / |/ /| |/ / _` | || / _` | ' \/ _` | _ \
\___\__,_|_|\_, /|___(_)___/\__,_|\_,_\__, |_||_\__,_|//_/
home page: /___/ /___/ gpg public key:
http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk/key.asc
