>>>>> "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Gary> On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 03:29:34PM +0100, Akim Demaille wrote:
>> Would someone see a problem if I adjust Autoconf to support
>> configure.ac in addition to configure.in? I think `.in' was a very
>> bad name (which in addition introduces an undesirable confusion
>> between autoconf instantiation and config.status instantiation).
Gary> Why not allow both for the next release, but print a warning
Gary> that tells the user configure.in is deprecated when they use it?
I never meant to remove configure.in support, and I think the warning
might even be too much. But I'd like to have the doc promote
configure.ac.
