Dan Manthey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Of course, if we decide that functions "are portable", we can skip the
> step of designing the hairy workaround.

I think we can decide that for Autoconf version 3, but not for
Autoconf 2.60.


_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

Reply via email to