Mark Carmichael wrote:
>
>
> Seems worthwhile give the "wc -l" approach; I'd probably try
>
> if ypwhich -m $map 2>&1 >/dev/null; then
>
> myself, but I don't know enough to be confident that there aren't lots of
> empty maps being served in the world. I also don't know whether the exit
> status of 'ypwhich' can be trusted across likely implementations/versions.
> So, keeping with the check-ypcat-stdout approach:
>
Actually I think an empty map ought to count.
-hpa
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init sc... Peter Bunclark
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init sc... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init sc... Peter Bunclark
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init sc... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init sc... Scott McDermott
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init sc... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init sc... Scott McDermott
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init sc... Peter Bunclark
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init sc... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init script Mark Carmichael
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init script H. Peter Anvin
- Re: auto_ -> auto. in init script Camm Maguire
