On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Ian Kent wrote: > On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Ian McLeod wrote: > > Ian, > > > > As someone who has struggled with the 4.0 pre-releases for several months > > now, I'd certainly love to see someone take over the role of maintainer. > > All the better if that person happened to have the first name "Ian". ;-) > > > > Great. Thanks for your support. > > And by coincidence my mothers maiden name is McColl.
:) > > > I have also been experimenting with a few patches to the existing pre10 > > code, mainly to deal with submounts that use NIS as the source for their > > maps. I'd be very interested in hearing more about the > > changes/improvements you've made, both in the userspace and kernel > > components. > > Cool. > > Submounts. That's where I started. This is painful yes. > > I am still testing/debugging my latest changes. I thought I was done > (several times now) but I am now in the hard to find and fix phase. I > would be happy to send you a copy of the patches if you think you would > find them useful and understand that they are not quite ready for > release. Maybe you could do a little testing in your environment to see > what other bugs can be driven out. I would be very interested in these. I consider my patches to be in a similar state. They work well here, but may not be suitable for wider distribution just yet. > I have in fact merged most of the Redhat v3 (from the source rpm) patches > not only the LDAP patch. I hope that you guys and the folks that created > them are not unhappy with that. There is still some more work to do on the > init script but I think the Redhat one is better than the original. I can't imagine that anyone would be upset by that :). -Ian _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
