On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Jim Carter wrote: > On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Ian Kent wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Mike Waychison wrote: > > > This module will have its own new autofs module (hopefully named > > > something other than autofs to avoid confusion/mishaps). The VFS will > > autofs v3 -> autofs.o > autofs v4 -> autofs4.o > May I suggest autofs5.o? It should still be named "autofs-something", > after all. >
Nop. I will continue to develop under the v4 banner. As far as I'm concerned Peter Anvin has claimed v5 and I don't want to challenge that. Mike Waychisons' initiative may possibly be called v6??? In any case the module works fine with v3 and v4 (I haven't tested 4.0.0pre10 for a while though). The 4.1 daemon detects the enhanced module if present. It is currently dubed 4.04. The 'plays well with others' is a self imposed design requirement. Ian _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
