On Tuesday 13 January 2004 20:03 pm, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> However, this doesn't address the issue of the client being *the same
> system*, in which case you can't just move the IP address away from
> it, since local == remote; you can no longer send packets to the
> server and get a response back.  You can do it if you can get the
> client and the server sides to bind to *different* IP addresses, in
> which case the current autofs behaviour will correctly see them as
> being separate and mount NFS.

Would binding an alias address to the interface be sufficient?

Dylan

-- 
Sweet moderation
Heart of this nation
Desert us not
We are between the wars
- Billy Bragg

_______________________________________________
autofs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs

Reply via email to