On Tue, 4 May 2004, Tom Georgoulias wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > We'll leave this to the people on the list to decide whether this > > behaviour should be changed. > > Well, from our point of view, it is nice to be able to create maps that > are empty at first and not have to worry about populating them until > later. This gives us our group the flexibility to plan out in advance > how our mounts will look, put the necessary mount points in place during > the regular maintenance intervals (by rebooting the systems, something > we can't always do), and adding map entries later on as the data is > moved to the new location. >
Good point. I'll be poking around to see what this means for the autofs code anyway. Ian _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
