I ran this on 40 clients last evening through our normal regression runs (9 hours, 1.5T of data, 127 mount points) and found that it behaved as expected.
I also think that it would be nice to have some form of regressions/tests to help validate. On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 07:30, Tom Georgoulias wrote: > Jeff Moyer wrote: > > > Has anyone had the chance to test this? autofs-4.1.2-5 from my people > > page, or the patch Ian sent to the list? I'd like to hear feedback, either > > positive or negative as I have to push a package into FC2 before the > > freeze on Friday. > > I have a system running it right now and it's behaving as expected, but > I haven't done any in depth testing of it because of other priorities. > What would be nice is to have a suite of smoke tests that I could run > through. Sometimes I don't see problems with new patches until much > later, after I thought I had wrung it out pretty well. ;) > > The bigger problem I'm facing right now is mounts dropping and not > remounting until a HUP signal is sent to the daemon. I've hacked around > this by setting up a cron job to send the HUP on an hourly basis, but > this is far from an elegant solution. > > Tom _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
