On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Hans Deragon wrote: > Greetings. > > > Remember me with my backfstype patch? Some people commented on it, I replied > and then never got any answers since. Altough functional, my patch was > questionned; the fix was not at the right place within the code (from a > design/elegance point of view; technically it works great). As I explained, I > have no knowledge of the overall architecture of Autofs and unfortunatly, I do > not have the time to get deep into it. > > Can my patch still be applied in the main branch until it is moved into a > more appropriate area of the code? Its still adds the new backsftype support, > does not cause any problems, is very localized, and very usefull. I have been > running it since the last 2 weeks without any problems. I am rolling it out in > the production environment.
I'm still working on the stuff I was working on when I originally replied to your request. I had a brief look at it then but I'm not likely to take a serious look at it for a while yet. Ian _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
