==> Regarding [autofs] backfstype patch.; Hans Deragon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> adds:
hans> Greetings. Remember me with my backfstype patch? Some people hans> commented on it, I replied and then never got any answers since. hans> Altough functional, my patch was questionned; the fix was not at the hans> right place within the code (from a design/elegance point of view; hans> technically it works great). As I explained, I have no knowledge of hans> the overall architecture of Autofs and unfortunatly, I do not have hans> the time to get deep into it. hans> Can my patch still be applied in the main branch until it is moved hans> into a more appropriate area of the code? Its still adds the new hans> backsftype support, does not cause any problems, is very localized, hans> and very usefull. I have been running it since the last 2 weeks hans> without any problems. I am rolling it out in the production hans> environment. Ultimately, this is up to Ian. I have a todo list item to implement a cachefs mount module (which was the agreed upon correct approach). Unfortunately, it's quite low on the todo list. :( -Jeff _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
