==> Regarding Re: [patch rfc] address regression in duplicate map entry order; [EMAIL PROTECTED] adds:
[snip] raven> So consider the following patch together with the original patch. I raven> think this might be all that's needed, at least in populating the raven> cache. raven> It reverts the change in 2) and changes cache_update to cache_add in raven> the needed places. raven> What do you think? raven> As I said above the other question that needs to be answered is raven> whether this will have undesirable side affects at lookup time? Hi, Ian, I've tested this patch and it resolves the problem. We should pursue the other map expiry related problem I described in my last mail separately, I think. Thanks! -Jeff _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
