On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Jeff Moyer wrote: > ==> Regarding Re: [patch rfc] address regression in duplicate map entry > order; [EMAIL PROTECTED] adds: > > [snip] > > raven> So consider the following patch together with the original patch. I > raven> think this might be all that's needed, at least in populating the > raven> cache. > > raven> It reverts the change in 2) and changes cache_update to cache_add in > raven> the needed places. > > raven> What do you think? > > raven> As I said above the other question that needs to be answered is > raven> whether this will have undesirable side affects at lookup time? > > Hi, Ian, > > I've tested this patch and it resolves the problem. We should pursue the > other map expiry related problem I described in my last mail separately, I > think.
Great. I'll assume that at least this change is in the rpm and merge it into the beta. Ian _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
