----- Original Message ----- From: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 6:25 PM Subject: Re: Tom Tromey PING!
> >>>>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Robert> Tom, I posted a question about getting the size reduction for > Robert> Makefile's using AM_COND's backported in to a 1.5 stable > Robert> release... so far there has been 1 reply, which amounted to > Robert> "that would be good"... > > Robert, what would be wrong with the head branch as is now? Why would > you want 1.5? Is it related to the Autoconf requirements? Well, head is for development AFAIK, so I cannot simply publish on the squid web pages tht developers need automake-head. And getting folk to grab a CVS snapshot just to develop squid is a little unreasonable (think interference with package management on debian/redhat, ports tree on *BSD etc). But pointing at the most recent release is ok!. > As far as I'm concerned, I believe there is significant improvement > since the latest release, and in particular the code works much better > for 2.50. > > So I'd be in favor of 1.6 being what we have. Just apply the patches > that have been submitted since. I'm cool with that too - whatever is easier and more acceptable for the core automake developers. Rob
