>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Robert, what would be wrong with the head branch as is now? Why >> would you want 1.5? Is it related to the Autoconf requirements? Robert> Well, head is for development AFAIK, so I cannot simply Robert> publish on the squid web pages tht developers need Robert> automake-head. And getting folk to grab a CVS snapshot just to Robert> develop squid is a little unreasonable (think interference Robert> with package management on debian/redhat, ports tree on *BSD Robert> etc). But pointing at the most recent release is ok!. Miscommunication. I really meant HEAD *if released*. So I'm asking it again: would the current CVS Automake be a viable release for you?
