I tried it on Django 1.6. The current autotest consumes the interface of Django 1.5.
On 03/29/2014 08:09 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: > For example, I just looked at your Django report, and it became > immediately clear that you are using an unsupported Django version. > I'm not sure how backwards compatible our app is with 1.4 now, so I'd > have to take a look. > > > On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hello All, > > So I went through the manual installation to see how the > entire stack > is, and many things broke. I have provided some information on > the issue > tracker too. > > > There's only so much we can do with the amount of distros > supported. Once every release cycle, we test autotest installation > on Ubuntu, and we never officially tested Debian. We have our > hands full with Fedora and RHEL. That's why we need people that > use Ubuntu and Debian on a daily basis to help, if they want the > set of programs to be well supported there. > > At the beginning, when the google team started developing > autotest, they were mostly an Ubuntu/Debian shop, so it worked > very well there. Once I took over, I fixed all the quirks with > RHEL and Fedora, and I've been since them taking care of those. > The differences between Linux distros make maintaining things > working in a handful of similar versions already a pain. The > bottom line is, in order to autotest to work well on RHEL, it took > one person with time available to work on it to fix things. > > > But after a while, I gave up the manual setup. autotest depends on > python-django and the python-django in Debian is newer. So some > interfaces broke there. > Right now, I set it up, as instructed, on the Ubuntu 12.04.4 > LTS Server > > > I suppose this involves the install script under /contrib, is that > right? You mention 'manual installation', and that did not give me > good feelings that you actually performed things as instructed. > > > autotest definitely needs a version dependency based > packaging. I myself > am a DD and may consider packaging it, some day, as I get more > versed > with autotest, and really consider using it for our day job. :-) > > Currently, at work, we are evaluating autotest for certain > cross-platform framework > > > I will try to take a look at it this weekend, but I can't make any > promises. > > > > > -- > Lucas -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com "Necessity is the mother of invention."
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Autotest-kernel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/autotest-kernel
