On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 7:57 AM, John Admanski <[email protected]> wrote: > Couldn't we at least have some kind of message at the DEBUG level? I suppose > it's not strictly necessary since we can tell that rsync is failing because > scp is being used, but it would be useful to at least at the DEBUG level get > some kind of detail from the CmdError. > Maybe this hints at a bigger problem; we shouldn't be wasting time trying to > use rsync on systems where it's not available at all. On systems where rsync > is available we really do want the verbose messages when it fails; on > systems were it's not, we really shouldn't even be running it at all.
That'd be good, some finer differentiation of errors. Having the logging in there seems to produce voluminous amounts of crap. _______________________________________________ Autotest mailing list [email protected] http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest
