On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 3:36 PM, John Admanski <[email protected]> wrote:
> So, a couple comments on the general approach.
>
> 1) If these are basically a coherent, related set of functions which
> are generally isolated from the rest of the utilities, maybe they
> should be in a module of their own? I know it's a bit much, but in
> general I don't like dumping even more functions into utils unless
> they really have no other place to go.

About this, I couldn't agree more. Maybe we could do some work
splitting out the utilty functions in categories, to organize the
autotest api. On an ideal world, I'd love to see things like:

from autotest.api import hash
from autotest.api import modules
from autotest.api import subprocess

Something like that, without a separation between client and server. I
could start on skeching something, if that proposition sounds
interesting.

-- 
Lucas
_______________________________________________
Autotest mailing list
[email protected]
http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest

Reply via email to