Coming back to this, we've discovered unixbench is not parallel make friendly. While debugging the issue, I noticed the 4.0.1 unixbench version we're using in Autotest is pretty old; with the latest being 5.1.2. Before I go about fixing the current version, I'm wondering if we should update to the latest version. The latest version has supposedly been updated to handle multi-CPU systems better.
http://code.google.com/p/byte-unixbench/ Comments? Concerns? - dale On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Amos Kong <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Eric Li(李咏竹) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for the quick response. Please take another look. > > > > Index: client/common_lib/utils.py > > =================================================================== > > --- client/common_lib/utils.py (revision 4747) > > +++ client/common_lib/utils.py (working copy) > > @@ -1165,6 +1165,16 @@ > > system('%s %s' % (configure, ' '.join(args))) > > > > > > +def make(extra='', make='make', timeout=None, ignore_status=False): > > + """ > > + Run make, adding MAKEOPTS to the list of options. > > + > > + @param extra: extra command line arguments to pass to make. > > + """ > > + cmd = '%s %s %s' % (make, os.environ.get('MAKEOPTS', ''), extra) > > + return system(cmd, timeout=timeout, ignore_status=ignore_status) > > + > > + > > def compare_versions(ver1, ver2): > > """Version number comparison between ver1 and ver2 strings. > > Looks good for me. > ACK > _______________________________________________ > Autotest mailing list > [email protected] > http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest >
_______________________________________________ Autotest mailing list [email protected] http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest
